Consultant says legislation needed to boost Illinois’ nuclear power industry

0Comments

To halt the closure of Exelon Corp.’s nuclear power plants in Rock Island, Clinton and Ogle County,

a utility consultant and former member of the Illinois Commerce Commission says legislation should be adopted to level the playing field for nuclear energy providers.

If the plants close, millions of dollars in economic activity will be lost, thousands will lose jobs, and the state would lose about $290 million in state and local taxes and nearly $1.1 billion in federal taxes each year. Stanford Levin, who is also professor emeritus of economics at Southern Illinois University in Edwardsville, said closing the plants would increase energy prices, according to a study ordered by the Illinois General Assembly.

“By the study’s estimation, if the plants close wholesale [energy] prices raise between 8 to 10 percent a year, or between $307

million to $437 million a year,” Levin said. 

Nearly half of Illinois’ power comes from nuclear power plants. The plants are in dire financial straits because they are not adequately compensated for providing no-carbon emissions as solar and wind energy companies are from various government subsidies and programs.

Levin said wind and solar generators do not put out as much energy as nuclear plants, and because wind is not a constant source of energy, it can only be purchased when it is available. “You can’t turn a nuclear plant on and off. Wind power only operates part of the time,” Levin said.

Levin argues that would put the state in the position to use fossil fuels as a backup, but added that creates the threat of violating carbon emission laws. Without energy coming from a guaranteed source such as nuclear power, that would put pressure on power grids. 

For those reasons, Levin said the only answer is legislation such as the proposed Illinois Low Carbon Portfolio Standard. If passed, it would require the two largest utilities in Illinois, Exelon and Ameren, to purchase low carbon energy credits. Seventy percent of that energy would then come from no or low-carbon sources, such as nuclear, wind and solar, allowing the nuclear industry its fair chance at profitability.

“It’s just like purchasing a personal seat license,” Levin said. “You pay to get the right [to sell]. In this case, the money goes to the energy provider. This legislation puts money in their [energy provider’s] pockets.”



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

WINDESCO: WeBoost Platform Increases Annual Output by $3,000 per Megawatts for Longroad Energy’s 145 Megawatts Acquired Wind Plant

WINDESCO: WeBoost Platform Increases Annual Output by $3,000 per Megawatts for Longroad Energy’s 145 Megawatts Acquired Wind Plant

WindESCo Helps Longroad Energy Optimize Wind Asset Performance to Unlock $430,000 in Annual Revenue

ACWA POWER: Signs three agreements for the first foreign investment based independent wind power project in Azerbaijan

ACWA POWER: Signs three agreements for the first foreign investment based independent wind power project in Azerbaijan

Following the signing of the implementation agreement for the $300 million Independent Power Project in January 2020, and under the patronage of the Ministry of Energy in Saudi Arabia, ACWA Power today executed the official agreements for the 240 MW wind power project that will be located in the Absheron and Khizi regions.

CAPITAL DYNAMICS: Exits 108-Megawatt Beacon II and V Solar Portfolio in Kern County, California

CAPITAL DYNAMICS: Exits 108-Megawatt Beacon II and V Solar Portfolio in Kern County, California

Capital Dynamics, an independent global private asset management firm, completed the sale of a majority interest in its Beacon portfolio to TortoiseEcofin and S&B USA Energy. Each buyer has acquired a 49.5% ownership of the portfolio. Capital Dynamics retains a minority stake of 1%.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Power News Wire.